Showing posts with label Cheaters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cheaters. Show all posts

Friday, January 25, 2008

Why flee to Mexico? are the minute Men coming to spend their money and try and hunt more Americanos?

Local
Celis dismissed from lawsuit

By Denise Malan (Contact)
Originally published 06:04 p.m., January 24, 2008
Updated 06:04 p.m., January 24, 2008

STORY TOOLS

* E-mail story
* Comments
* iPod friendly
* Printer friendly
* Print with Comments

related linksMore Local News

* Former police chief fired in Driscoll
* RTA finds pedestrian hit only rear left wheels
* Birth defects 84 percent higher in Nueces Co.

related linksSHARE THIS STORY
Newsvine Del.icio.us Digg Fark Yahoo! Reddit

CORPUS CHRISTI — Mauricio Celis has been dismissed from a lawsuit by a former client who alleges he represented her without a law license.

Celis' attorney said the dismissal proves that the claim lacked merit. The opposing lawyer said the move was a legal maneuver to allow the claim against Celis to go forward later, because related criminal charges against Celis would pose a hurdle for now.

Celis also filed papers Wednesday seeking the return of property the state took during a Jan. 4 search of his office. The Attorney General's search warrant did not contain sufficient facts to support money laundering allegations, Celis argues in his motion. The Attorney General's office said it would withhold comment until it reviews the motion.

In the case involving the former client, local attorney Thomas J. Henry had filed a suit in October on behalf of Paloma Steele, who hired Celis' firm, CGT Law Group International. The firm negotiated a settlement in the case, and Celis signed the settlement agreement as attorney for Steele, though he later said that was a mistake. Steele sued to recover attorneys' fees in the case, naming CGT, Celis and his partners as defendants.

Criminal defendants can ask courts to abate, or stop, civil cases while criminal charges are pending. Celis, 36, was indicted on four felony criminal charges in November, and he asked the Nueces County court to abate the Steele case.

Henry said dismissing Celis from the case eliminates his standing to stop it, and allows Henry to take testimony from Celis and his partners.

"I am free today, tomorrow, for the next year to sue Mr. Celis on behalf of Ms. Steele," Henry said Thursday. "The nonsuit was nothing more than allowing my client to move forward."

Celis attorney said Henry's move showed there were no grounds for the lawsuit.

"This proves what we've been saying all along," said Lawrence Coffey, representing Celis in the Henry lawsuit. "At the end of this politically motivated witch hunt, there's nothing there. By dropping this lawsuit, Thomas J. Henry has gone a long way toward showing that his entire line of attack against Mr. Celis has ultimately no basis in reason or in the law."

Henry ran television ads starting in September alleging that Celis did not have a law license. Celis has since been sued by the Texas Attorney General's Office and the state Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, alleging he practiced law without a license. A Nueces County grand jury indicted him on charges of perjury, theft, falsely holding oneself out as a lawyer and impersonating a peace officer.

A search warrant signed by District Judge Tom Greenwell, allowing the Attorney General's search of Celis office, contained an affidavit claiming Celis was linked to a known Mexican drug runner and that the firm laundered money. Celis denies any connection to the drug trade and says the attorney general's move was politically motivated.

Celis' motion to recover documents says the warrant did not contain probable cause for the search and seizure, and that documents seized had nothing to do with the stated purpose. He also said the attorney general's office cannot use a search warrant to get documents the district attorney failed to get before Celis' indictment on criminal charges.

"A search warrant is not a post-indictment discovery tool to be used by one law enforcement agency to assist another agency in seizing the defendant's documents," the motion states.

An attorney general's spokesman said Thursday the office had not received the filing and couldn't comment.

View latest stories with comments »
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: We've changed the way comments appear on the site. Click here for more information.

* 1. Keep it clean.Comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented will get the ax. Creative spelling of such terms also will be banned.
* 2. Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
* 3. Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything.
* 4. Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
* 6. Keep it local. Do not post direct links to sites outside of Caller.com.
* 7. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
* 8. Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
* 9. Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
* 10. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
* 11.Help us get it right. If you find a factual error or misspelling, email newmedia@caller.com or metrodesk@caller.com, or call 886-3697.

Your Comment Display Options:
Show Flagged Comments Hide Flagged Comments
+ Increase Font Size - Decrease Font Size
Post Your Comments

Post 1 January 24, 2008 at 6:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)

sad times bro. sad times

Post 2 January 24, 2008 at 8:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

That is the first time I hear drugs mentioned. Celis made his money running cases, not drugs. IMHO It seems anytime a man gets rich quick someone always has to accuse them of "drugs". There are plenty of illegitmate ways to get rich in America still, posing as an attorney is one of them. He does seem to be guilty of that, but not drugs.

Post 3 January 24, 2008 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The bottom line is that you have no reason to trust him what so ever. I would not accuse him of drugs nor would I be the least bit suprised. Celis deserves to be punished either way.

Post 4 January 24, 2008 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

post 2

How do know what Celis has been up to when hanging out with a known drug cartel??? How do you honestly know?
Also Celis pretending to be a cop from a nearby county that is a known drug trafficking thoroughfare. Going into the passenger jet business with the known drug cartel guy. The same guy that's listed on a joint bank account as the "Vice President" of the jet company?

Why else would Mauricio Celis be having run ins with guys/strippers at our local strip clubs? Where he would actually bang the apartment door down of this stripper and threaten her?
To also wave a gun to a man in front of a strip joint? Strip clubs are notorious for illegal narcotics.

They say all you have to do is check the police records. All this is documented .....Celis' run ins with the local law enforcement. Previously he had the Nueces County Sheriff (Larry Olivarez) backing him up whenever he professed to be a "5"

Sooo ...what makes so sure he WASN'T running drugs for a profit?

The Firestone/ford debacle is drying up. Celis had to inevitably find other ways to continue making millions of dollars to keep his phony standing in the political sphere.

This guy has been caught and will now pay the price. He's lied about who he is many times. Why do you choose to believe him now? Celis says he has never had anything to do with drugs.

Let me remind you, he also said, I'm an international lawyer. I have a degree and license to practice law. I am also a Deputy Sheriff for Duval County. HE IS NONE OF THE ABOVE! He lied.

Once a liar, always a liar.
IMHO.

Post 5 January 24, 2008 at 9:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Based upon lack of integrity, one could see where TJ Henry and Celis are very much alike. Henry y Celis LLP - "Ambulance 101"

Post 6 January 24, 2008 at 10:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It's just as I thought,Henry is like a jealous Hog. He saw some one
else making money on bogus law suits. Comment #1 is correct. Sad times bro. Sad times

Post 7 January 25, 2008 at 12:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't like Lawyers who advertive the way many do. I find it difficult to trust anyone in the legal profession.
I believe it should be illegal for lawyers and doctors to advertize on TV/Radio.

Post 8 January 25, 2008 at 12:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This is only one case which dropped charges probably due to the lingering of the case. I am curious about the rest of the cases.

Post 9 January 25, 2008 at 12:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Practicing law without a liscense is still not cool.

Post 10 January 25, 2008 at 1:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I have my own personal opinions, BUT, for the sake of argument, let's say Post 2 is right; that drugs are not involved. If MauriBoy did in fact make his money from Firestone/Ford lawsuits in Mexico and he is NOT a lawyer, can the defendants who paid millions to MauriBoy and his clients in Mexico sue to get those funds back? Does anyone here know, FOR A FACT, Mexico's laws concerning who can practice law? It seems Firestone/Ford may have reasonable cause to review that decision.

Regardless, I have to agree with Post 4; MauriBoy seems to be just another crook who thought he was too smart to get caught.

Post 11 January 25, 2008 at 6:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

A little research or just a trip down memory lane to the 1980's and IRAN-CONTRA will prove who the real drug dealers are in this Untied States. The ones who fly cocaine in by the metric tons in military aircraft. Remember Oliver North, Noriega, Barry (not Bernie) Seale and their connection to our current President and his predecessor? Please, post 2 is right because nobody can compete with the Federal Govt at running drugs.

Post 12 January 25, 2008 at 8:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post 11

Thankyou for somehow changing a local criminal into a I hate all Republicans rant.

What your basically saying is your upset with previous Republican administrations, so it's ok for Mauricio Celis to run drugs and launder the money here in our home town of Corpus Christi.

Your awesome! = {

Post 13 January 25, 2008 at 8:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Thomas Henry said .."he temporarily dropped the case" so he can testify!

Celis has used this lawsuit to keep Thomas Henry out of the upcoming trial!

Paloma Steele has a year to go back and sue again to reclaim lost settlement money that went into a fake lawyers account.

It seems to me that Thomas Henry did the right thing. Now Henry can be a major player in the prosecution.

And this shows nothing of the sort. Some of you say that this goes to show they do not have strong evidence against Mauricio Celis.

That's really funny. If you have 1000 lawsuits against you and one is cleaned off the list, now you have 999 lawsuits. Sounds like Celis is going to pay the piper, one way or another.

Mauricio will end up fleeing to Mexico. You watch.

Post 14 January 25, 2008 at 10:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Lawyers, Liars it's all the same. Everyone tries to benefit off the other. It's just the way it is.

Post 15 January 25, 2008 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Thomas J. Henry has proven himself to be one cagey and good lawyer in this move... He now has the trump cards, and they're not all Jokers named Celis! Criminal trials will just give him that much more evidence to take Celis to the cleaners in civil cases...

Friday, January 11, 2008

How do you sleep?

Elle asks Mauricio:"Do you know any thing about hard work"?

Elle(waiting for Mauricio's response): "Say what you need to say"

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Grande Commununique.........or is Sirius?Planting Sugar Kane seeds......Sunflowers

Re(2): Politics 101........KC and The Sunshine Band played Corpus Christi's Elite .......
Posted on December 3, 2007 at 00:18:45 AM by d1

Dang< error report just in .....I wonder if the "sold out" luncheon held at the Solomon P. Ortiz center.

Do you think he:

A) was "given" tickets?
B)Invited by "invitation only" mail?
C) Phone/faxed tickets
D) Arranged the whole thing?
E) All of the Above?

Now instead of Kealin, put in Skip Noe, Bryan Smith, Hooks and Scott Elli~ ff.....well Rove wants to make sure who you are , for all those of you who did because, well I regret to inform you now he knows each of you all and your vitals and those of your children and your people and those you may love.



Talk about lining up for the slaughter.
Lambs for all the lions.

Brown Bag Special, anyone?

Because $43 bucks sucks the Big You know what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Or was it $45 bucks?

Why reHire you when they get you for free?

KC and The Sunshine Band played Corpus Christi's Elite and they paid him for it.

Data mining and your mug for free, Kc gets paid by who?

buy you.......

Hey Judge Hayden.....just who was that "original Carpetbaggers" guy you were conducting business with in Church?

Crime and Punishment

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

With JA Canales you could not possibly be accused of ...........

being a second class man....but yet you care ? Por Que? If some chick thinks you are "interested" then you will compensate her for her time.....but you want free chit.....I guess in your case you will forever regret what you thought was free.....I bet Tony the Tiger is way more expensive.

Too bad you were a pinche putho,culero, and if you think you are a 2nd class citizen then you would know better then any one , chi flatho......
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Second-class citizen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Legal status of Persons
Concepts

Citizenship
Nationality
Naturalization
Leave to Remain
Immigration
Illegal immigration
Statelessness
Legal designations

Citizen
Native-born citizen
Naturalized citizen
Dual-citizen
Alien
Migrant worker
Refugee
Illegal immigrant
Political prisoner
Stateless person
Administrative detainee
Social politics

Immigration law
Nationality law
Nationalism
Nativism (politics)
Immigration debate
This box: view • talk • edit

Second-class citizen is an informal term used to describe a person who is systematically discriminated against within a state or other political jurisdiction, despite their nominal status as a citizen or legal resident there. While not necessarily slaves, outlaws or criminals, second-class citizens have limited legal rights, civil rights and economic opportunities, and are often subject to mistreatment or neglect at the hands of their putative superiors. Instead of being protected by the law, the law disregards a second-class citizen, or it may actually be used to harass them.

Second-class citizenry is generally regarded as a violation of human rights. Typical impediments facing second-class citizens include, but are not limited to, disenfranchisement (a lack or loss of voting rights), limitations on civil or military service (not including conscription in every case), as well as restrictions on language, religion, education, freedom of movement and association, marriage, housing and property ownership.

The term is generally used as a pejorative or in the context of civil society activism and governments will typically deny the existence of a second class within the polity. As an informal term, second-class citizenship is not objectively measured; however, cases such as the American South under segregation (and apartheid in South Africa), the caste system of India and other countries, and the marginalization of religious and ethnic minorities and women in many countries worldwide, have been historically described as creating second-class citizenry.

By contrast, a resident alien or foreign national may have limited rights within a jurisdiction (such as not being able to vote, and having to register with the government), but is also given the law's protection, and is usually accepted by the local population. A naturalized citizen carries essentially the same rights and responsibilities as any other citizen (a possible exception being ineligibility for certain public offices), and is also legally protected.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Sell us accidently indicted by a "shotgun" or through strong, consistent old-fashioned reporting.?

Columnists
Katharine Armstrong to Caller-Times reporter Jaime Powell: 'I trust you'
We got the quail-hunting accident story the way dedicated journalists have tracked down news for years - through strong, consistent old-fashioned reporting.


Tuesday, February 14, 2006
The next time someone argues that newspaper journalists are dinosaurs headed for extinction, I'll remind them of Vice President Dick Cheney's shooting accident on the Armstrong Ranch.





Radio stations and cable news channels didn't break that news; neither did local television news stations. You didn't see it first on national news Web sites or blogs or on the Sunday morning political talk shows.

Our own Caller-Times reporters were first with the story that Cheney had accidentally shot Austin attorney Harry Whittington during a quail hunt in Kenedy County.

We broke the national story at 1:48 p.m. Sunday with an e-mail alert and a story on our Web site Caller.com, 48 minutes before the Associated Press moved anything on the story and a full hour before CNN issued an e-mail alert.

We got the story the way dedicated journalists have tracked down news for years - through strong, consistent building of sources and good, old-fashioned reporting.

As on most weekends, we operated with a skeleton crew this past Sunday, with most staffers scheduled for work in the afternoon.

Because of the Armstrong family's long-standing professional relationship with reporter Jaime Powell, Katharine Armstrong called Powell around 8 a.m. Sunday and left voice mail messages to return the call. Powell, who was in Austin, did not immediately receive the messages.

Unable to reach Powell, Armstrong called the newsroom at about 11 a.m. and told reporter Kathryn Garcia about the shooting.

After that conversation, Armstrong called Powell again, this time reaching her on her cell phone, and also recounted the accident for her.

Driving back to Corpus Christi, Powell talked to Armstrong in detail, and Garcia reported the story fully. She confirmed the shooting with the White House, checked on Whittington's condition at the hospital and called the Kenedy County Sheriff's Office, who said at the time that they had no record of a shooting incident at the Armstrong Ranch.

Garcia contacted her editors and wrote the story, which then went through a quick editing process before being posted on Caller.com at 1:48 p.m. by New Media Manager Trent Spofford.

Once in the newsroom, Powell spoke to Armstrong again and said she wanted to talk with the vice president, whom she had met last year at the funeral of Katharine Armstrong's father, Tobin. Cheney came to the phone and briefly spoke with Powell - so far his only public comment on the matter.

Online Editor John Allen worked with the newsroom throughout the day and night Sunday, updating the story several times on Caller.com.

In Monday's paper, we provided more details, maps and photos for those readers who wanted more in-depth news. We continued to follow the story Monday on Caller.com, with news that the sheriff didn't investigate the accident until Sunday, and in today's newspaper.

The Associated Press and CNN picked up the story after us on Sunday afternoon, and news media organizations throughout the country, including The New York Times and ABC's "Good Morning America," credited the Caller-Times with breaking the story.

We fielded dozens of media calls Monday, with Powell and Garcia granting numerous radio, television and print interviews.

Meanwhile, the national press corps grilled White House press secretary Scott McClellan on Monday about why news of the shooting wasn't released by the White House or Cheney.

The vice president's main concern, McClellan said, was for Whittington's well-being. And he said that it was with the vice president's knowledge and consent that Armstrong called her hometown paper and Powell.

"You had a relationship with my father," Armstrong told Powell. "You and I had a relationship and that relationship had grown stronger after my father's death, and my family was comfortable with calling the hometown newspaper."

Maybe it's the pride in my staff talking, but I believe the White House press corps is whining just a bit because this news came first through a local daily newspaper's Web site and not following a mass press briefing thousands of miles away from the accident.

We got the story first by consistently working hard and professionally and gaining the trust of our sources. And because we did, the rest of the world got the story, too.

"We knew we needed to make it public," Armstrong told Powell. "It was a private weekend hosted by a private family, and we were comfortable calling the hometown paper and you. I trust you."

Caller-Times' employees work hard to establish that trust every day, and that, coupled with aggressive, thorough and accurate reporting, will secure our existence for decades to come.

Whether we deliver the news through a printed newspaper delivered on your lawn, or a Web site or the new technology of tomorrow, we'll still be the ones who gather the news and report it.

And if we do our job right, we'll still be the ones you trust.

Libby Averyt is vice president and editor of the Caller-Times. Phone: 886-3681; e-mail: averytl@caller.com

View latest stories with comments »